Adare vs Image Flat
Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Image Flat, QLD 4560
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 3, Image Flat wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adare | Image Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | - |
| Median unit price | $285K | $780K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.66% | 4.07% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 3.8% |
| Population | 1,027 | 457 |
Adare vs Image Flat: what the numbers say
For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $780K in Image Flat, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Image Flat the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 3.8% in Image Flat, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 457, roughly 2.2 times the size of Image Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison