Skip to main content

Adare vs Kiamba

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Kiamba, QLD 4560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 2, Kiamba wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareKiamba
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%2.72%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%6.65%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+20.8%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%0.6%
Population1,027191

Adare vs Kiamba: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $490K in Kiamba, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Kiamba the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.72% in Kiamba, a gap of 1.02 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +20.8% in Kiamba, so recent momentum favours Kiamba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Kiamba and 0.9% in Adare, so landlords in Kiamba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 191, roughly 5 times the size of Kiamba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Kiamba for recent price momentum, Kiamba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison