Adare vs Lamington
Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Lamington, QLD 4285
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 2, Lamington wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adare | Lamington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | - |
| Median unit price | $285K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | 3.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.66% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,027 | 89 |
Adare vs Lamington: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.54% in Lamington, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 89, roughly 12 times the size of Lamington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adare for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison