Skip to main content

Adare vs Mermaid Beach

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Mermaid Beach, QLD 4218

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 4, Mermaid Beach wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareMermaid Beach
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%-
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+7.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%2.1%
Population1,0277,329

Adare vs Mermaid Beach: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $1.1M in Mermaid Beach, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Mermaid Beach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.45% in Mermaid Beach, a gap of 1.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +7.7% in Mermaid Beach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 2.1% in Mermaid Beach, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mermaid Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,329 against 1,027, roughly 7 times the size of Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison