Skip to main content

Adare vs Mount Pleasant

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Mount Pleasant, QLD 4521

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 4, Mount Pleasant wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareMount Pleasant
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%3.39%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+10.0%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%2.5%
Population1,027390

Adare vs Mount Pleasant: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $450K in Mount Pleasant, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Mount Pleasant the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +10.0% in Mount Pleasant, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 2.5% in Mount Pleasant, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 390, roughly 2.6 times the size of Mount Pleasant; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Adare vs Mount Pleasant: Suburb Comparison 2026