Skip to main content

Adare vs Nerang

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Nerang, QLD 4211

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 4, Nerang wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareNerang
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%4.80%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+16.3%
3-year house growth-+47.9%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.0%
Population1,02717,048

Adare vs Nerang: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $785K in Nerang, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Nerang the pricier one.

On cash flow, Nerang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.15%, compared with 3.74% in Adare, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +16.3% in Nerang, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 1.0% in Nerang, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,048 against 1,027, roughly 17 times the size of Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nerang for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison