Skip to main content

Adare vs Paradise Point

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Paradise Point, QLD 4216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 4, Paradise Point wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareParadise Point
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$1.7M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.45%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%-
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate-2.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%1.7%
Population1,0277,062

Adare vs Paradise Point: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $1.7M in Paradise Point, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Paradise Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.45% in Paradise Point, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and -2.1% in Paradise Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Adare, while Paradise Point went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 1.7% in Paradise Point, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Paradise Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,062 against 1,027, roughly 7 times the size of Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison