Skip to main content

Adare vs Richlands

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Richlands, QLD 4077

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 4, Richlands wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareRichlands
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.51%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%4.20%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+20.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%1.3%
Population1,0275,621

Adare vs Richlands: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $785K in Richlands, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Richlands the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.51% in Richlands, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +20.5% in Richlands (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Richlands, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 1.3% in Richlands, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Richlands is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,621 against 1,027, roughly 5 times the size of Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Richlands for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison