Adare vs Shelly Beach
Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Shelly Beach, QLD 4551
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 2, Shelly Beach wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adare | Shelly Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | - |
| Median unit price | $285K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | 1.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.66% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6%estimate | +16.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +35.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,027 | 925 |
Adare vs Shelly Beach: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 1.88% in Shelly Beach, a gap of 1.86 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +16.0% in Shelly Beach, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 925, larger than Shelly Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adare for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison