Skip to main content

Adare vs Willowbank

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Willowbank, QLD 4306

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 3, Willowbank wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareWillowbank
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.46%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%3.95%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+21.5%
3-year house growth-+73.8%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.8%
Population1,0271,351

Adare vs Willowbank: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $620K in Willowbank, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Willowbank the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.46% in Willowbank, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +21.5% in Willowbank, so recent momentum favours Willowbank, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Willowbank and 0.9% in Adare, so landlords in Willowbank face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Willowbank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,351 against 1,027, larger than Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Willowbank for recent price momentum, Willowbank for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison