Adventure Bay vs Buckland
Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Buckland, TAS 7190
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 2, Buckland wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adventure Bay | Buckland |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | - |
| Median unit price | $350K | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.71% | 2.51% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.79% | 6.43% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Population | 218 | 188 |
Adventure Bay vs Buckland: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Adventure Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.71%, compared with 2.51% in Buckland, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 4.5% in Adventure Bay and 5.5% in Buckland, so landlords in Adventure Bay face less competition for tenants.
Adventure Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 218 against 188, larger than Buckland; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adventure Bay for rental income, Adventure Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison