Adventure Bay vs Gray
Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Gray, TAS 7215
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 0, Gray wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adventure Bay | Gray |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | - |
| Median unit price | $350K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.71% | 4.39% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.79% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 2.4% |
| Population | 218 | 71 |
Adventure Bay vs Gray: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Gray leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.39%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 1.68 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Gray and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Gray face less competition for tenants.
Adventure Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 218 against 71, roughly 3.1 times the size of Gray; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gray for rental income, Gray for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison