Adventure Bay vs Kelso
Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Kelso, TAS 7270
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 3, Kelso wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adventure Bay | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | - |
| Median unit price | $350K | $575K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.71% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.79% | 3.37% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 6.1% |
| Population | 218 | 182 |
Adventure Bay vs Kelso: what the numbers say
For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $575K in Kelso, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Kelso the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 4.5% in Adventure Bay and 6.1% in Kelso, so landlords in Adventure Bay face less competition for tenants.
Adventure Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 218 against 182, larger than Kelso; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adventure Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison