Adventure Bay vs Longley
Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Longley, TAS 7150
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 1, Longley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adventure Bay | Longley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | - |
| Median unit price | $350K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.71% | 3.14% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.79% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | +12.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +11.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 6.4% |
| Population | 218 | 241 |
Adventure Bay vs Longley: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Longley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.14%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +12.4% in Longley, so recent momentum favours Longley, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 4.5% in Adventure Bay and 6.4% in Longley, so landlords in Adventure Bay face less competition for tenants.
Longley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 241 against 218, larger than Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Longley for rental income, Longley for recent price momentum, Adventure Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison