Adventure Bay vs Mount Hicks
Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Mount Hicks, TAS 7325
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 2, Mount Hicks wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adventure Bay | Mount Hicks |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | - |
| Median unit price | $350K | $375K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.71% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.79% | 5.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Population | 218 | 356 |
Adventure Bay vs Mount Hicks: what the numbers say
For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $375K in Mount Hicks, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Mount Hicks the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 4.5% in Adventure Bay and 6.7% in Mount Hicks, so landlords in Adventure Bay face less competition for tenants.
Mount Hicks is the bigger suburb, with a population of 356 against 218, larger than Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adventure Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison