Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Natone

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Natone, TAS 7321

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 3, Natone wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayNatone
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%3.97%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+1.4%
3-year house growth-+21.4%
Vacancy rate4.5%1.9%
Population218288

Adventure Bay vs Natone: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $415K in Natone, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Natone the pricier one.

On cash flow, Natone leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.05%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +1.4% in Natone, so recent momentum favours Adventure Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Natone and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Natone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Natone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 288 against 218, larger than Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Natone for rental income, Adventure Bay for recent price momentum, Natone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison