Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Orford

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Orford, TAS 7190

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 2, Orford wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayOrford
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%3.59%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%1.85%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+13.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate4.5%1.9%
Population218685

Adventure Bay vs Orford: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $1.1M in Orford, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Orford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Orford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.59%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +13.7% in Orford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Orford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Orford and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Orford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Orford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 685 against 218, roughly 3.1 times the size of Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Orford for rental income, Orford for recent price momentum, Orford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison