Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Otago

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Otago, TAS 7017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 3, Otago wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayOtago
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$680K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%3.31%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%4.19%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+18.1%
3-year house growth-+45.3%
Vacancy rate4.5%9.1%
Population218596

Adventure Bay vs Otago: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $680K in Otago, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Otago the pricier one.

On cash flow, Otago leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.31%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +18.1% in Otago, so recent momentum favours Otago, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 4.5% in Adventure Bay and 9.1% in Otago, so landlords in Adventure Bay face less competition for tenants.

Otago is the bigger suburb, with a population of 596 against 218, roughly 2.7 times the size of Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Otago for rental income, Otago for recent price momentum, Adventure Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison