Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Preservation Bay

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Preservation Bay, TAS 7316

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 2, Preservation Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayPreservation Bay
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%3.43%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%4.65%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate4.5%0.9%
Population218100

Adventure Bay vs Preservation Bay: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $410K in Preservation Bay, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Preservation Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Preservation Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.43%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Preservation Bay and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Preservation Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adventure Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 218 against 100, roughly 2.2 times the size of Preservation Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Preservation Bay for rental income, Preservation Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison