Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Ridgley

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Ridgley, TAS 7321

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 3, Ridgley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayRidgley
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%2.64%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%3.50%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+5.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate4.5%3.8%
Population218645

Adventure Bay vs Ridgley: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $485K in Ridgley, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Ridgley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adventure Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.71%, compared with 2.64% in Ridgley, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +5.2% in Ridgley (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ridgley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.8% in Ridgley and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Ridgley face less competition for tenants.

Ridgley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 645 against 218, roughly 3.0 times the size of Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adventure Bay for rental income, Ridgley for recent price momentum, Ridgley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison