Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Wilmot

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Wilmot, TAS 7310

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 0, Wilmot wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayWilmot
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$190K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%-
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+10.9%
3-year house growth-+29.0%
Vacancy rate4.5%0.7%
Population218287

Adventure Bay vs Wilmot: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $190K in Wilmot, which makes Wilmot the more affordable unit market and Adventure Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wilmot leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 2.71% in Adventure Bay, a gap of 1.89 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +10.9% in Wilmot, so recent momentum favours Wilmot, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wilmot and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Wilmot face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wilmot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 287 against 218, larger than Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wilmot for rental income, Wilmot for recent price momentum, Wilmot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison