Skip to main content

Adventure Bay vs Woodbridge

Property investment comparison - Adventure Bay, TAS 7150 vs Woodbridge, TAS 7162

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adventure Bay wins 3, Woodbridge wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdventure BayWoodbridge
Median house price$700K-
Median unit price$350K$405K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%2.04%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%4.03%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+13.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate4.5%3.6%
Population218547

Adventure Bay vs Woodbridge: what the numbers say

For units, Adventure Bay sits at a median of $350K against $405K in Woodbridge, which makes Adventure Bay the more affordable unit market and Woodbridge the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adventure Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.71%, compared with 2.04% in Woodbridge, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Adventure Bay (an estimate) and +13.5% in Woodbridge (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woodbridge, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.6% in Woodbridge and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Woodbridge face less competition for tenants.

Woodbridge is the bigger suburb, with a population of 547 against 218, roughly 2.5 times the size of Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adventure Bay for rental income, Woodbridge for recent price momentum, Woodbridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Adventure Bay vs Woodbridge: Suburb Comparison 2026