Skip to main content

Agnes Banks vs Gerringong

Property investment comparison - Agnes Banks, NSW 2753 vs Gerringong, NSW 2534

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Agnes Banks wins 4, Gerringong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAgnes BanksGerringong
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$650K$915K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)3.93%4.06%
1-year house growth+4.8%+2.8%
3-year house growth+16.9%+8.6%
Vacancy rate2.4%2.5%
Population9964,165

Agnes Banks vs Gerringong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Agnes Banks and $1.5M in Gerringong.

For units, Agnes Banks sits at a median of $650K against $915K in Gerringong, which makes Agnes Banks the more affordable unit market and Gerringong the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.8% in Agnes Banks and +2.8% in Gerringong, so recent momentum favours Agnes Banks, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Agnes Banks houses are +16.9% and Gerringong houses +8.6%, so Agnes Banks has compounded faster than Gerringong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Agnes Banks and 2.5% in Gerringong, so landlords in Agnes Banks face less competition for tenants.

Gerringong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,165 against 996, roughly 4.2 times the size of Agnes Banks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Agnes Banks for recent price momentum, Agnes Banks for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison