Skip to main content

Agnes Banks vs Lakemba

Property investment comparison - Agnes Banks, NSW 2753 vs Lakemba, NSW 2195

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Agnes Banks wins 2, Lakemba wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAgnes BanksLakemba
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$650K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.77%
Gross rental yield (units)3.93%5.32%
1-year house growth+4.8%+2.3%estimate
3-year house growth+16.9%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.5%
Population99617,092

Agnes Banks vs Lakemba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Agnes Banks and $1.5M in Lakemba, so Agnes Banks is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Agnes Banks sits at a median of $650K against $540K in Lakemba, which makes Lakemba the more affordable unit market and Agnes Banks the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.8% in Agnes Banks and +2.3% in Lakemba (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Agnes Banks, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Lakemba and 2.4% in Agnes Banks, so landlords in Lakemba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakemba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,092 against 996, roughly 17 times the size of Agnes Banks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Agnes Banks for a lower purchase price, Agnes Banks for recent price momentum, Lakemba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison