Agnes vs Avoca
Property investment comparison - Agnes, VIC 3962 vs Avoca, VIC 3467
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Agnes wins 1, Avoca wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Agnes | Avoca |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $390K | $400K |
| Median unit price | - | $320K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.06% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.61% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Population | 61 | 1,356 |
Agnes vs Avoca: what the numbers say
The median house price is $390K in Agnes and $400K in Avoca, so Agnes is the cheaper entry point, with Avoca houses about 3% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Avoca and 1.1% in Agnes, so landlords in Avoca face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,356 against 61, roughly 22 times the size of Agnes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Agnes for a lower purchase price, Avoca for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison