Aitkenvale vs Bundaberg Central
Property investment comparison - Aitkenvale, QLD 4814 vs Bundaberg Central, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aitkenvale wins 0, Bundaberg Central wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aitkenvale | Bundaberg Central |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | - |
| Median unit price | $530K | $520K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.62% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 4.98% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.6% |
| Population | 4,797 | 162 |
Aitkenvale vs Bundaberg Central: what the numbers say
For units, Aitkenvale sits at a median of $530K against $520K in Bundaberg Central, which makes Bundaberg Central the more affordable unit market and Aitkenvale the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bundaberg Central and 1.1% in Aitkenvale, so landlords in Bundaberg Central face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aitkenvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,797 against 162, roughly 30 times the size of Bundaberg Central; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bundaberg Central for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Bundaberg Central, QLD 4670
Open Bundaberg Central suburb profileRecent sales in Bundaberg Central
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison