Skip to main content

Aitkenvale vs Mackay Harbour

Property investment comparison - Aitkenvale, QLD 4814 vs Mackay Harbour, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aitkenvale wins 1, Mackay Harbour wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAitkenvaleMackay Harbour
Median house price$615K-
Median unit price$530K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.62%5.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.61%-
1-year house growth+16.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%0.7%
Population4,797686

Aitkenvale vs Mackay Harbour: what the numbers say

For units, Aitkenvale sits at a median of $530K against $620K in Mackay Harbour, which makes Aitkenvale the more affordable unit market and Mackay Harbour the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mackay Harbour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.02%, compared with 4.62% in Aitkenvale, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mackay Harbour and 1.1% in Aitkenvale, so landlords in Mackay Harbour face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aitkenvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,797 against 686, roughly 7 times the size of Mackay Harbour; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mackay Harbour for rental income, Mackay Harbour for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison