Skip to main content

Aitkenvale vs Mooloolaba

Property investment comparison - Aitkenvale, QLD 4814 vs Mooloolaba, QLD 4557

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aitkenvale wins 4, Mooloolaba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAitkenvaleMooloolaba
Median house price$615K-
Median unit price$530K$885K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.62%2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.61%3.65%
1-year house growth+16.9%estimate+12.0%
3-year house growth-+22.7%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.6%
Population4,7978,202

Aitkenvale vs Mooloolaba: what the numbers say

For units, Aitkenvale sits at a median of $530K against $885K in Mooloolaba, which makes Aitkenvale the more affordable unit market and Mooloolaba the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aitkenvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.62%, compared with 2.60% in Mooloolaba, a gap of 2.02 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.9% in Aitkenvale (an estimate) and +12.0% in Mooloolaba, so recent momentum favours Aitkenvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mooloolaba and 1.1% in Aitkenvale, so landlords in Mooloolaba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mooloolaba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,202 against 4,797, larger than Aitkenvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aitkenvale for rental income, Aitkenvale for recent price momentum, Mooloolaba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison