Aitkenvale vs Mount Samson
Property investment comparison - Aitkenvale, QLD 4814 vs Mount Samson, QLD 4520
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aitkenvale wins 4, Mount Samson wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aitkenvale | Mount Samson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | - |
| Median unit price | $530K | $730K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.62% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 4.07% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.9%estimate | +14.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +26.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 6.3% |
| Population | 4,797 | 625 |
Aitkenvale vs Mount Samson: what the numbers say
For units, Aitkenvale sits at a median of $530K against $730K in Mount Samson, which makes Aitkenvale the more affordable unit market and Mount Samson the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.9% in Aitkenvale (an estimate) and +14.7% in Mount Samson, so recent momentum favours Aitkenvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Aitkenvale and 6.3% in Mount Samson, so landlords in Aitkenvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aitkenvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,797 against 625, roughly 8 times the size of Mount Samson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aitkenvale for recent price momentum, Aitkenvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison