Skip to main content

Albanvale vs Black Range

Property investment comparison - Albanvale, VIC 3021 vs Black Range, VIC 3381

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albanvale wins 3, Black Range wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbanvaleBlack Range
Median house price$690K-
Median unit price-$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%4.75%
1-year house growth+10.4%+11.3%
3-year house growth+13.4%+51.8%
Vacancy rate0.6%6.2%
Population5,641274

Albanvale vs Black Range: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Albanvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.70% in Black Range, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Albanvale and +11.3% in Black Range, so recent momentum favours Black Range, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albanvale houses are +13.4% and Black Range houses +51.8%, so Black Range has compounded faster than Albanvale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Albanvale and 6.2% in Black Range, so landlords in Albanvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albanvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,641 against 274, roughly 21 times the size of Black Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albanvale for rental income, Black Range for recent price momentum, Albanvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison