Skip to main content

Albanvale vs Forrest

Property investment comparison - Albanvale, VIC 3021 vs Forrest, VIC 3236

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albanvale wins 3, Forrest wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbanvaleForrest
Median house price$690K-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.75%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%-
1-year house growth+10.4%+4.6%
3-year house growth+13.4%+7.5%
Vacancy rate0.6%2.0%
Population5,641257

Albanvale vs Forrest: what the numbers say

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.74% in Albanvale and 3.75% in Forrest, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Albanvale and +4.6% in Forrest, so recent momentum favours Albanvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albanvale houses are +13.4% and Forrest houses +7.5%, so Albanvale has compounded faster than Forrest over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Albanvale and 2.0% in Forrest, so landlords in Albanvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albanvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,641 against 257, roughly 22 times the size of Forrest; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albanvale for recent price momentum, Albanvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison