Skip to main content

Albanvale vs Lake Bunga

Property investment comparison - Albanvale, VIC 3021 vs Lake Bunga, VIC 3909

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albanvale wins 3, Lake Bunga wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbanvaleLake Bunga
Median house price$690K-
Median unit price-$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%4.25%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%5.00%
1-year house growth+10.4%-1.0%
3-year house growth+13.4%-4.0%
Vacancy rate0.6%2.2%
Population5,641408

Albanvale vs Lake Bunga: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Lake Bunga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.25%, compared with 3.74% in Albanvale, a gap of 0.51 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Albanvale and -1.0% in Lake Bunga, so recent momentum favours Albanvale, while Lake Bunga went backwards.

Looking back three years, Albanvale houses are +13.4% and Lake Bunga houses -4.0%, so Albanvale has compounded faster than Lake Bunga over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Albanvale and 2.2% in Lake Bunga, so landlords in Albanvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albanvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,641 against 408, roughly 14 times the size of Lake Bunga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lake Bunga for rental income, Albanvale for recent price momentum, Albanvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison