Albanvale vs Merton
Property investment comparison - Albanvale, VIC 3021 vs Merton, VIC 3715
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albanvale wins 1, Merton wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albanvale | Merton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $690K | - |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | 2.68% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.00% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | - |
| Population | 5,641 | 216 |
Albanvale vs Merton: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Albanvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.68% in Merton, a gap of 1.06 percentage points.
Albanvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,641 against 216, roughly 26 times the size of Merton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Albanvale for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison