Skip to main content

Albanvale vs Port Melbourne

Property investment comparison - Albanvale, VIC 3021 vs Port Melbourne, VIC 3207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albanvale wins 5, Port Melbourne wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbanvalePort Melbourne
Median house price$690K-
Median unit price-$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%2.93%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%4.95%
1-year house growth+10.4%+0.0%
3-year house growth+13.4%-8.8%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.1%
Population5,64117,633

Albanvale vs Port Melbourne: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Albanvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.93% in Port Melbourne, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Albanvale and +0.0% in Port Melbourne, so recent momentum favours Albanvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albanvale houses are +13.4% and Port Melbourne houses -8.8%, so Albanvale has compounded faster than Port Melbourne over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Albanvale and 1.1% in Port Melbourne, so landlords in Albanvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Port Melbourne is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,633 against 5,641, roughly 3.1 times the size of Albanvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albanvale for rental income, Albanvale for recent price momentum, Albanvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Albanvale vs Port Melbourne: Suburb Comparison 2026