Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Ascot

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Ascot, QLD 4007

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 2, Ascot wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekAscot
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%-
1-year house growth+17.7%+10.4%
3-year house growth+49.1%+11.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.3%
Population16,3856,531

Albany Creek vs Ascot: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $900K in Ascot, which makes Ascot the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +10.4% in Ascot, so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albany Creek houses are +49.1% and Ascot houses +11.3%, so Albany Creek has compounded faster than Ascot over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Ascot and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Ascot face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 6,531, roughly 2.5 times the size of Ascot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Ascot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison