Albany Creek vs Bundaberg Central
Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Bundaberg Central, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 0, Bundaberg Central wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albany Creek | Bundaberg Central |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | - |
| Median unit price | $920K | $520K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.13% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.00% | 4.98% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +49.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 16,385 | 162 |
Albany Creek vs Bundaberg Central: what the numbers say
For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $520K in Bundaberg Central, which makes Bundaberg Central the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bundaberg Central and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Bundaberg Central face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 162, roughly 101 times the size of Bundaberg Central; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bundaberg Central for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Bundaberg Central, QLD 4670
Open Bundaberg Central suburb profileRecent sales in Bundaberg Central
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison