Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Clayfield

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Clayfield, QLD 4011

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 3, Clayfield wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekClayfield
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%3.80%
1-year house growth+17.7%+10.4%
3-year house growth+49.1%+25.0%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.4%
Population16,38510,897

Albany Creek vs Clayfield: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $820K in Clayfield, which makes Clayfield the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +10.4% in Clayfield, so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albany Creek houses are +49.1% and Clayfield houses +25.0%, so Albany Creek has compounded faster than Clayfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Clayfield and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Clayfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 10,897, larger than Clayfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Clayfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison