Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Dicky Beach

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Dicky Beach, QLD 4551

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 1, Dicky Beach wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekDicky Beach
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%4.20%
1-year house growth+17.7%+10.9%estimate
3-year house growth+49.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%0.4%
Population16,3851,921

Albany Creek vs Dicky Beach: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $785K in Dicky Beach, which makes Dicky Beach the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +10.9% in Dicky Beach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Dicky Beach and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Dicky Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 1,921, roughly 9 times the size of Dicky Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Dicky Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison