Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Dolphin Heads

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Dolphin Heads, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 2, Dolphin Heads wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekDolphin Heads
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%3.21%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%7.38%
1-year house growth+17.7%+8.5%
3-year house growth+49.1%+52.7%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.6%
Population16,385413

Albany Creek vs Dolphin Heads: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Dolphin Heads leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.21%, compared with 3.13% in Albany Creek, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +8.5% in Dolphin Heads, so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albany Creek houses are +49.1% and Dolphin Heads houses +52.7%, so Dolphin Heads has compounded faster than Albany Creek over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Albany Creek and 1.6% in Dolphin Heads, so landlords in Albany Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 413, roughly 40 times the size of Dolphin Heads; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dolphin Heads for rental income, Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Albany Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison