Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Kiamba

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Kiamba, QLD 4560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 1, Kiamba wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekKiamba
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%2.72%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%6.65%
1-year house growth+17.7%+20.8%
3-year house growth+49.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%0.6%
Population16,385191

Albany Creek vs Kiamba: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $490K in Kiamba, which makes Kiamba the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Albany Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.13%, compared with 2.72% in Kiamba, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +20.8% in Kiamba, so recent momentum favours Kiamba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Kiamba and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Kiamba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 191, roughly 86 times the size of Kiamba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albany Creek for rental income, Kiamba for recent price momentum, Kiamba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison