Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Mackay Harbour

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Mackay Harbour, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 0, Mackay Harbour wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekMackay Harbour
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%5.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%-
1-year house growth+17.7%-
3-year house growth+49.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%0.7%
Population16,385686

Albany Creek vs Mackay Harbour: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $620K in Mackay Harbour, which makes Mackay Harbour the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mackay Harbour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.02%, compared with 3.13% in Albany Creek, a gap of 1.89 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mackay Harbour and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Mackay Harbour face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 686, roughly 24 times the size of Mackay Harbour; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mackay Harbour for rental income, Mackay Harbour for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison