Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Mackay

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Mackay, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 2, Mackay wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekMackay
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%4.49%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%6.30%
1-year house growth+17.7%+17.0%
3-year house growth+49.1%+45.7%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.4%
Population16,3854,026

Albany Creek vs Mackay: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Mackay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.49%, compared with 3.13% in Albany Creek, a gap of 1.36 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +17.0% in Mackay, so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albany Creek houses are +49.1% and Mackay houses +45.7%, so Albany Creek has compounded faster than Mackay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Mackay and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Mackay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 4,026, roughly 4.1 times the size of Mackay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mackay for rental income, Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Mackay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison