Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Richlands

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Richlands, QLD 4077

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 0, Richlands wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekRichlands
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%3.51%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%4.20%
1-year house growth+17.7%+20.5%estimate
3-year house growth+49.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.3%
Population16,3855,621

Albany Creek vs Richlands: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $785K in Richlands, which makes Richlands the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Richlands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.51%, compared with 3.13% in Albany Creek, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +20.5% in Richlands (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Richlands, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Richlands and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Richlands face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 5,621, roughly 2.9 times the size of Richlands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Richlands for rental income, Richlands for recent price momentum, Richlands for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison