Albany Creek vs Takura
Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Takura, QLD 4655
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 1, Takura wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albany Creek | Takura |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | - |
| Median unit price | $920K | $695K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.13% | 3.14% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.00% | 4.23% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +49.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 3.8% |
| Population | 16,385 | 553 |
Albany Creek vs Takura: what the numbers say
For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $695K in Takura, which makes Takura the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.13% in Albany Creek and 3.14% in Takura, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Albany Creek and 3.8% in Takura, so landlords in Albany Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 553, roughly 30 times the size of Takura; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Albany Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison