Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Te Kowai

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Te Kowai, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 3, Te Kowai wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekTe Kowai
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%-
1-year house growth+17.7%+1.5%
3-year house growth+49.1%+34.1%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.8%
Population16,385227

Albany Creek vs Te Kowai: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Te Kowai leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 3.13% in Albany Creek, a gap of 1.47 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +1.5% in Te Kowai, so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albany Creek houses are +49.1% and Te Kowai houses +34.1%, so Albany Creek has compounded faster than Te Kowai over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Albany Creek and 1.8% in Te Kowai, so landlords in Albany Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 227, roughly 72 times the size of Te Kowai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Te Kowai for rental income, Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Albany Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison