Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Towen Mountain

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Towen Mountain, QLD 4560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 3, Towen Mountain wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekTowen Mountain
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$930K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%2.25%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%3.21%
1-year house growth+17.7%-
3-year house growth+49.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%0.5%
Population16,385304

Albany Creek vs Towen Mountain: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $930K in Towen Mountain, which makes Albany Creek the more affordable unit market and Towen Mountain the pricier one.

On cash flow, Albany Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.13%, compared with 2.25% in Towen Mountain, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Towen Mountain and 1.5% in Albany Creek, so landlords in Towen Mountain face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 304, roughly 54 times the size of Towen Mountain; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albany Creek for rental income, Towen Mountain for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison