Skip to main content

Albion Park vs Ballina

Property investment comparison - Albion Park, NSW 2527 vs Ballina, NSW 2478

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albion Park wins 2, Ballina wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbion ParkBallina
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price$780K$735K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.36%
1-year house growth+12.1%+5.8%
3-year house growth+11.3%+19.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.3%
Population13,8269,735

Albion Park vs Ballina: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Albion Park and $980K in Ballina.

For units, Albion Park sits at a median of $780K against $735K in Ballina, which makes Ballina the more affordable unit market and Albion Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.1% in Albion Park and +5.8% in Ballina, so recent momentum favours Albion Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albion Park houses are +11.3% and Ballina houses +19.0%, so Ballina has compounded faster than Albion Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Ballina and 0.8% in Albion Park, so landlords in Ballina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albion Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,826 against 9,735, larger than Ballina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albion Park for recent price momentum, Ballina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison