Skip to main content

Albury vs Wyongah

Property investment comparison - Albury, NSW 2640 vs Wyongah, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albury wins 1, Wyongah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlburyWyongah
Median house price$950K$945K
Median unit price$530K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.23%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.46%
1-year house growth+14.2%+14.5%estimate
3-year house growth+14.6%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.5%
Population4,9552,020

Albury vs Wyongah: what the numbers say

The median house price is $950K in Albury and $945K in Wyongah, so Wyongah is the cheaper entry point, with Albury houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Wyongah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 3.23% in Albury, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.2% in Albury and +14.5% in Wyongah (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wyongah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Albury and 2.5% in Wyongah, so landlords in Albury face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,955 against 2,020, roughly 2.5 times the size of Wyongah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyongah for rental income, Wyongah for a lower purchase price, Wyongah for recent price momentum, Albury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison