Skip to main content

Aldgate vs Hackney

Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Hackney, SA 5069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, Hackney wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldgateHackney
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$535K$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%2.51%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%-
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%1.1%
Population3,471575

Aldgate vs Hackney: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Aldgate and $1.6M in Hackney, so Aldgate is the cheaper entry point, with Hackney houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $1.4M in Hackney, which makes Aldgate the more affordable unit market and Hackney the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.46% in Aldgate and 2.51% in Hackney, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Hackney and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Hackney face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 575, roughly 6 times the size of Hackney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aldgate for a lower purchase price, Hackney for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison