Aldgate vs Jupiter Creek
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Jupiter Creek, SA 5153
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 1, Jupiter Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Jupiter Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 1.86% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Population | 3,471 | 231 |
Aldgate vs Jupiter Creek: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aldgate leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 1.86% in Jupiter Creek, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Jupiter Creek and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Jupiter Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 231, roughly 15 times the size of Jupiter Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aldgate for rental income, Jupiter Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison